« Potties Potties Everywhere | Main | The Background »

January 5, 2006

"Just"

A: So how's your baby?

B: Good! He's learning his first words and he's just this close to walking. And his eyes are still blue. For a while there we thought they might turn hazel, since our eyes are both hazel, but nope! Still blue!

A: Oh ... but his eyes are just blue, right?

~~~~~

D: So how's your daughter?

E: Great! She just had her checkup and she's HUGE. 95th percentile for height and weight!

D: But, she's just big, right?

~~~~~

G: How did your appointment go?

H: Oh ... better than I thought. The biopsy results came back and it is a tumour, but it's benign. So they're going to watch it for now and we'll see what happens over the next year.

G: So that's ok then. It's just a benign tumour.

~~~~~

S: So how is Frances?

A: Great!

S: Did she enjoy Christmas?

A: Oh yes. First child and first grandchild. LOTS of presents.

S: Ooooooh. That must have been fun.

A: It was.

S: She must be getting big, too.

A: Uh ... well, not really.

S: No? But they grow so fast at that age!

A: Hmm. Well. Not Frances.

S: Oh. But it goes up and down. I found that with my kids. They'd grow slow and then they'd grow fast. I'm sure she'll catch up.

A: *laughs* We have lots of little people in our family, so I think she'll probably stay small.

S: Well, that's ok though. I mean, she's just small, right?

~~~~~

My daughter is not just anything. She is not just sweet, or just smart, or just happy, or just loving, or even just small. She is sweet, smart, happy, loving and small. Being small does not detract from her perfection, but when you say "just small," you make it clear that in your eyes it does. You would not attach "just" to a characteristic you deemed desirable or neutral. "Just" is used to minimize--and no one minimizes good things--or to rebuke. But why rebuke me for saying something that is obvious to everyone who sees her? She's tiny. She's the size of a very small one-year-old. It's a fact. It's not good, it's not bad, it's just a fact. Frances herself already knows, so if your concern is for her self-esteem, you can spare yourself: It isn't my recitation of her height and weight stats that makes the other kids (all of whom are much larger than she is) snatch toys out of her grasp without a thought, and it isn't my recounting of our tales in the medical trenches that causes her to stand there without protest wearing a downcast face. She is already learning that she is small, and what that means.

So yes, it is already causing her problems; and as she grows it will cause more. This is not an inherent characteristic of her size, but a reflection of the world she lives in and the value it places on big. Elevator buttons don't grow themselves at a certain height; toilet seat height is not inevitable; the distance from the countertop to the floor is not a law of physics; where in a room the light-switch is placed was not decided based on the inherent characteristics of electricity. No. These were all choices made by humans, and those choices reflect their beliefs--about normal and about size, and about whether built environments should accomodate themselves to people or vice versa.

If "just small" is meant as, "that's not a REAL problem," then you can bite my lilly-white ass. Depression, psychological problems and poverty are not more widespread in the dwarf than in the normal-size community by coincidence. The prejudices of other people including the way those prejudices play out systemically are REAL problems.

And here's a point to ponder: When I say that she's small, when I say how small she is, when I observe that she is likely to remain small for reasons unknown to us, this is simply a fact, with no more or less value content than if I had observed that the colour of her hair is blonde (but likely to be brown as an adult), or that her prescription is -6.5, or that her laugh is throaty and her eyes are as blue as a summer sky. It is a verbal recitation of a fact. Period. That you then feel the need to tell me that it's not a problem--that she is "just small"--only tells me that you actually think it is. Otherwise, you would also be telling me that she is also "just smart," "just pretty," "just happy," "just well-behaved," and so forth. No rejoinder seems needed when I say that she knows her colours and shapes and letters--if I share her good caretaking of Baby Eloise or the way her Thomas the Tank Engine trains like to kiss each other no one points out that she is "just sweet."

On the other hand, if "just small" is meant as "I have no idea what to say because I'm sure being small is terrible, but it's not cancer and she seems fine otherwise," or "at least that's the only problem she has," then you can go fuck yourself with a rusty cheesegrater. It's only a problem for her because other people think it should be a problem, and by saying she is "just small" you've included yourself in that group. It's only going to be a problem for her because our whole society has been built around normal, and because of our ridiculous belief that "bigger is better." Schumacher published Small is Beautiful in 1974, but we still don't act that way, and this is as applicable to individual people as it is to the world of economics that he wrote about. Bigger is not better, it's just bigger.

It's true that I still struggle with this myself from time to time--it's not easy to overcome 30 years of social conditioning in twenty-four months--but I am making progress and pointed reminders that Frances is "just small" from someone who has far less experience with the dwarf world than I do are not going to help.

So if I'm talking about my daughter, and I mention her size, and it doesn't seem that it is a problem to me--if I am smiling, if I seem amused at her ability to eat a tremendous amount of food without growing, if I laugh when I say how far below the charts she is, if I seem unbothered when I mention that she is not going to "catch up" but will instead remain small, here is a hint: Respond as you would if you really believed that being small is OK. Respond as you would if I had mentioned to you some amusing value-neutral characteristic--that she has all her teeth, that her feet are a size four, that she really likes cheesies. Don't act as if any mention of small size must by its very nature be a complaint, as if the only proper way to handle a young child's very short stature is under any circumstances, not to bring it up, to pretend it doesn't exist. Don't tell me she is "just small." As Yankee Transplant said many months ago, Frances isn't just small--she is all small. And small is beautiful.

~~~~~

What do you think? Too much to unload on some poor unsuspecting soul at the office water cooler?


Posted by Andrea at January 5, 2006 9:49 AM under Being Small

EMAIL this entry

(comments fields are below this section)











Comments

I think that possibly could be a bit much to unload on someone at the water cooler. However, I think this is a great post. The always wise Yankee did a post about labels and how she tries to avoid attaching labels to her daughters because no one is simply the "smart one" or as you pointed out "just ___".


Posted by: ccw at January 5, 2006 10:25 AM

Next Comment

Kittens, pretty antique rings, Cinderella's slipper, a perfect rose, snowflakes, ladybugs...

"Good things come in small packages"

As I've mentioned before, my height has always been my biggest problem. And saying, "Good things come in small packages" truly palls. However, I'm still on the short side of normal and I know that likely Frances will grow up to be shorter than me, so I can only imagine the extent of her difficulties of being a Little Person in a world made for giants. My only assvice is to collect useful things to make her life easier.

Things I could not function without:
Stools of different heights placed in strategic places around the house (Muffin Man truly appreciates these as well)

Several good sets of tongs, I use high-end kitchen tongs, but Frances may find the kind used to shelve goods at stores to be better suited to her purposes.

Comfortable seat boosters for driving cars that don't have seats that move far enough forward for me to reach the pedals. (Several people I know also use pedal extenders, I find them to be generally too slippery). Seat boosters can be used for other seats as well.

Posted by: liz at January 5, 2006 10:32 AM

Next Comment

A small friend of mine would declare herself "a dime among pennies"...

while such phrases may be cold comfort, they can also be comebacks for when Frances is older, since the real problem is how our societal expectations will affect how she is treated.

Thanks for the food for thought.

Posted by: parodie at January 5, 2006 11:58 AM

Next Comment

too much to unload at the water cooler? Never! While most likely comments such as she is "just small" are not meant in a mean spirited way (perhaps, like you suggest "just" acting as a sortof "um", or "huh" that is, a word to stick in there when you are not sure what to say)...still, this is about language and labels and unless we are unafraid to confront this, most especially when it comes to our children, then people will never know they are doing potential harm with the words they choose. And, if the person really is using "just" in a dismissive or somehow negative way then they really need to be unloaded upon! Good post, made me really think about how I talk about my daughter and other people's children as well!

Posted by: Sarah R.E. at January 5, 2006 12:42 PM

Next Comment

Well, as you will see, I have a mean streak. I would be waiting, just waiting, to have the opportunity to say, "Well, he/she's just average, right?" Ooh so mean . . .mean, mean, mean (and absolutely right, too, by the way!)


Posted by: elsimom at January 5, 2006 1:53 PM

Next Comment

You can always counter that Frances is perfect in every way. Perfection in miniature. Her stature shouldn't matter. You're absolutely right. No, I don't think it's too much to unload on someone at the watercooler, but you should also make people aware that when they say she's "just small" that you interpret that as "flawed" somehow.

Frances is beautiful. She's got an amazing vocabulary for someone her age, and if she knows letters, colors, numbers and all that -- she's ahead of some children years older than her. She's got loving parents, and is healthy. The next time says she's "just small", you should say, "Yes. And she's just perfect the way she is."

Posted by: KLee at January 5, 2006 2:14 PM

Next Comment

I think it's a little much for the water cooler, and I'll tell you why..

I love words, and I love thinking about the ways in which words that could be substituted for each other mean subtly different things, and this post got me thinking....

You see, I have used "just big" to describe my own kid, who looked a bit like Jabba the Hut at 6 months... and I've used "just the way he is," and I've used "Just perfect" to describe someone as well.

While I'm sure that you can tell by context and expression if the "just" in question is a "I really think small is awful, but I'm putting a brave face on it" vs. a "Hey, size doesn't matter to me in the slightest" comment -- in thinking about your statement "respond as if it didn't matter," *I* might use "she's just small."

And what that would mean is "She's simply small."

Because one of the definitions/synonyms of "Just," used in that context, is "simply." As in "Simply perfect" or "Simply beautiful" or "simply the way she is." Pure and simple. No judgement intended within.

And of course, another meaning of "Just" is "right," or "rightful." As in -- Frances is simply the right size.

I love words. I hope this doesn't offend, but I wanted to offer another perspective.

Posted by: Sara at January 5, 2006 2:45 PM

Next Comment

All Small indeed. I totally heart Frances, for all that she is: pretty, sweet, blue-eyed, and mini.
Like Liz, my height (5 feet even) has been a challenge. My step stool and tall friends have saved me many times.

Posted by: yankee transplant at January 5, 2006 3:08 PM

Next Comment

Liz--it's not assvice. I'm not sure what we're going to do about stools. Right now I'm trying to figure out if it's really worthwhile to have a bathroom sink lowered for her, as several parents of LPs of my acquaintance have done. This is one of those times when a diagnosis would be truly invaluable. The rest of it is far enough in teh future that I can pretend I don't have to think about it (ahhhhh--relief).

parodie--see, I *love* that. To me, Frances is a dime among pennies. Or a diamond among pennies. But how many people won't see her sparkle because they're either fixated on her size, or fixated on not appearing fixated by her size?

Sarah RE--that's the thing. They're not in the least bit intending to be mean-spirited. The ones who are are the jerks who glare at me, as if I made her small by abusing her. Except that they probably believe that they are sticking up for the rights of children. But anyway. No, they're not mean-spirited. It's just that they've never encountered that situation before. Frances is exceptionally rare. I'm not surprised that people are never sure what to say, I just get so TIRED of hearing it.

Elsimom, oh, that would be fun.

Sara, no, I'm not offended at all. But I disagree. There's a world of difference--well, maybe not a whole world, a tectonic plate perhaps--between "just small" and "just perfect." In the just perfect (wonderful, marvelous, etc.) usage, "just" doesn't mean "simply" so much as "nothing but"--it's a word that indicates that there is nothing about that person (situation, book, movie, whatever) that isn't perfect (wonderful, marvelous, etc.). That usage, applied to small, wouldn't be so hot either.

If I said that someone is "just tall," wouldn't your mind begin filling in the prefix--"there's nothing wrong with him, he's ...." If I said that someone is "just slim," wouldn't your mind begin filling in the prefix? "She's not anorexic, she's ...." And it's the same with "just small." There's an unstated prefix there, "There's nothing wrong with her, she's..." or "She's not sick, she's ..." or whatever. Lots of options, but they're all negative.

I know that often when people say that, they mean to say that there's nothing wrong with being small (although the mere fact that someone feels it's necessary to point out the lack of wrongness is a red flag--no one points out the lack of wrongness in blond hair or a winning smile), but they don't. If they really believed that small size is no problem--if they were truly speaking from a place of not caring about size--it would be unremarked upon. There would be no need for "she's just small." I'd tell someone about how she knows the alphabet, and can name her colours, and loves to snuggle, and watch TV, and eats like a horse, and makes her toys kiss each other, and has blond hair with two crowns, and huge blue eyes, and is two and wears a size 9 months--and it would all get the same kind of response. I wouldn't get a "wow, really, aww, hahaha, oh my god!, aww, she's beautiful, and she's JUST SMALL." As they say--one of these things is not like the others.

This isn't, by the way, something I've known for long. When Frances was a wee baby, I used "just small" myself all the time, sort of feeling that it didn't quite fit but not really knowing why. (And I meant it as "there's nothing wrong with her, she's....") It's something that's taken two years of daily living and lots of experience (well, two years of experience) to figure out. I'm sure in two years I'll have moved a bit farther down teh path. So absolutely, I wouldn't unload it on someone at the watercooler--if it took me two yeras to figure out, why should they know? But every time I hear "just small" I hate it more and more (and I hear it a fair bit).

Posted by: Andrea at January 5, 2006 4:41 PM

Next Comment

too much for the water cooler?.....Well, I'm thinking you may want to back off on the rusty cheese grater part. Who knows where it's been.

Posted by: tammi at January 5, 2006 4:57 PM

Next Comment

People aren't going to get it. The word "just" is thrown around as both a positive--just this teeny little problem, no biggie, and as a negative--just one for dinner? And the average joe isn't going to be nice and stick around for an answer because they won't know what to say. They won't know how amazing Frances is unless they meet her and see her smartness, funniness, perfection, and beauty.

So...to paraphrase YT (and Dr. Seuss), all small is a better phrase, yes, and I hope that Frances is afforded many opporunities in life and much happiness and success. It's a big mountain to climb, but she's up to the challenge. Especially with a mom like you looking out for her.

Posted by: Running2Ks at January 5, 2006 8:53 PM

Next Comment

I suggest that you not lower the sink until all her classmates no longer have to use a stool to use their sinks.

Muffin Man uses stools to reach the faucets still and he's 4.

Posted by: liz at January 6, 2006 3:02 PM

Next Comment

Ahem...ALMOST 4.

Less than a month....aaaaggghhh!

Posted by: liz at January 6, 2006 3:08 PM

Next Comment

yes!!! this is soooo annoying. We get it often combined with "But she's healthy, right? Just small?"

Posted by: marianne at January 16, 2006 10:07 PM

Next Comment

Go Berserk




Remember Me?