|
« Monday Mission: PRESS RELEASE | Main | Privacy: The Cost of Free Speech » |
|
|
March 13, 2007 Blog Witch
"Magic is the art of changing consciousness at will." Dion Fortune In wicca, everywhere is sacred space. There are no churches, no temples, no special groves; everywhere is the centre of an infinite circle, including where you are right now: a cabin in a northern boreal forest, the computer lab at a university on the east coast, a scorching afternoon in a southern garden with the laptop on a chaise lounge, watching a fine drizzle on the Pacific coast through your living room window. The unergonomic chair giving you carpal tunnel or the worn-out mattress you're sprawled on, with a spring poking you in the rib. Everywhere is the centre. In a panentheistic religion (where god/dess is believed to be in the world) this is inevitable. Deity--the gods--aren't entities living in some special place that is above and beyond the earth who can only be contacted in particular earthly spots. They are the earth. The keyboard I am typing this on, the sun's glare on the windshield during my morning drive in to work, the trickles of melting snow on the road, the bits of pine tree littering the backyard, the monitor you are reading these words on, right now, are all god/dess. Yes, wiccans generally spend a part of their rituals calling the goddess from the moon, and the god from the sun; but these are metaphors. It would be more correct to state that the purpose of these portions of the rituals are meant to remind us of something that is always true: s/he is here, always, in the half-cold tea sitting in the mug beside the mousepad, in the voice of a friend on the telephone, in your fingers, your eyes. As you sit, this very moment, reading this, goddess is running through your veins. A lot of people wrap themselves in knots trying to prove or disprove that magic "works." But whether or not it "works" depends on what it is you are asking it to do; if you asked me whether a pair of scissors "work," I'd say "yes" if you want to cut open a bag of potato chips and "no" if you need to scrub the bathroom sink. Does it work? Do you mean, can I turn you into a frog? No. If it worked that way, I'd have a mansion on a ten-acre lot, and a harem. I have none of those things so, clearly, that's not what it's good for. Magic is the art of changing consciousness at will. All effective writing, for instance, is magic. This goes beyond opinion pieces, where the goal is to change someone's mind. Mind-changing is important and valuable; but changing consciousness is something other, and it works on both the writer and the reader. John Gardner called fiction "a vivid and continuous dream"; it is, but creating that vivid and continuous dream is magic. To arrange words on a page or a screen in such a way that their combined rhythm, sibilance, pattern and repetition, imagery, symbols, metaphors, allusions, influences, situations, scenes, tension, takes the reader out of their uncomfortable chair and puts them in a cafe in Paris or a battleground on Middle Earth or a rolling deck on a Viking ship at sea, to make them more aware of the imaginary events you have put together than they are of the ache in their right shoulder and their scratchy socks, is to alter their state of consciousness at will. It's magic. And if, once the incantation ends, the reader is transformed in some small way, then the magic was very strong. But it isn't just the readers who are affected--especially here, on the blogosphere. One of the rites of passage, for a wiccan, is to choose a name. The right name, like the right word, is powerful; it doesn't just reflect reality, but shapes it. We become what we name ourselves. When I first chose Athena Dreaming, it didn't quite fit; but now it does, like an old glove, and far better than my given one. I didn't just choose a name for myself; I chose my self. Choosing a name pales in comparison to what we do every day on personal blogs. Last year I struggled with the sense that blog-Andrea was fast becoming someone different than life-Andrea. By choosing what to include, what to leave out, and the words to frame what's here, it is inevitable that the version of me who emerges here differs from the version of me who brushes her teeth in the morning after eating an english muffin with peanut butter. Blog-Andrea talks a lot more, for one thing; she uses more ten-dollar words, she is more open, she is braver and stronger, better organized, and she doesn't lounge around on the couch on Saturday mornings in her pyjamas until noon. The more people who read the blog, the more of a difference I noticed, because the me who was created in the mind of each reader was added together in some kind of weird synergistic calculus, from which the me I really am was then subtracted. If you think back to the paragraph on fiction, imagine how different the Viking ship in your head was from the Viking ship in my head, and the Viking ship in the heads of the few hundred other people who will read this post. The specific creak of the wood, snap of the sails, the position of your feet on the boards, the presence of other people, the size of the ship, all of these details that I did not include will have been filled in by your imagination. And so it is when I talk about me--the colour of my hair, the clothes I am wearing, my tone of voice, the presence or absence of dirty dishes in the kitchen sink or a ring around the bathtub, will all have been filled in by your imagination; even if I am excruciatingly honest in every detail that I relate, there is so much that I do not and cannot relate that blog-Andrea and life-Andrea helplessly differentiate. This is then amplified and reflected back when readers take what I give them and fill in the blanks (which is exactly what you're supposed to do--still, it's a strange feeling). Sometimes when someone posts a particularly supportive comment, I feel like shouting, "My socks don't match! I never make the bed!" But here is the cautionary tale: they then approach each other again. Not because blog-Andrea becomes more like life-Andrea, but because life-Andrea becomes more like blog-Andrea. Every day I write myself into being, here; and it changes me. Every day I use words to reflect my own experience; but they shape that experience, too. They alter my consciousness. They alter me. So to anyone coming along behind me on the blogging path, who is slowly beginning to feel the audience and the construction diverging from her sense of herself, who is wondering to what extent the blog-self reflects or diverges from the life-self, who is seeing the amplification of difference from the audience, I would say, step carefully. Choose wisely. Be as honest as you can, spill your guts, open a vein and bleed all over the monitor; but when you lie, and you will have to even if only in ommission, lie carefully. Be sure the persona projected on your blog is a self you don't mind becoming. Because you will. Blogs are magic. We make the blogs, and then the blogs make us. Make your blog-self a you worth being. ~~~~~ Dear Readers, I'm feeling a little spent. There wasn't much sleep last night (and is the 'last night' as I write this the same 'last night' when you read it?). I feel the last of my energy dribbling out through my feet; my blood is only blood, after all, and the imagined four readers at the four corners of the continent have vanished back into the ether. I'd like to thank them, though, for involuntarily participating in my conceit. And now it's lunch time. I don't know about you, but I'm starving. The circle is open, but never broken. So must it be. Posted by Andrea at March 13, 2007 7:18 AM under Witch EMAIL this entry (comments fields are below this section) Comments I'm finding this blogging thing a strange experience. I want to write because I enjoy writing, want to share what's going on in my life, want to build a community of support for myself and find myself editing what I write and taking note of what people comment on more. Which scares me because then I wonder, am I writing this to express myself, or to entertain? It's a slippery slope as my husband would say and it does change us I think. Posted by: deb at March 13, 2007 7:39 AM
Your definition of why you write resonates with me in a lot of ways. Thank you, as usual, for shaping the thoughts in such an outstanding way. And your discussion of Wicca is something I wanted but hadn't had the energy yet to pursue. I know that insomnia is a miserable burden, but look what you've done with it. You are so worthwhile that it awes me. I have a grandson who mismatches his socks on purpose. If you need a few extra to achieve this result, I have orphans in plenty in my sock drawer. Posted by: Mary G at March 13, 2007 8:17 AM
I think I approach this question from the opposite angle (surprise, surprise). I'm more aware of the persona I adopt in real-life interactions, and of its difference from my inner experience of myself, than I am of the artificiality of my blog-self. If you're a student in my class, a friend meeting me for coffee, what you're seeing is a small and highly artificial construct of me: it's me doing an impersonation of me. My blog-self is that, too, though not quite as obviously. I perceive my blog-self as being far more flippant than any of my other selves. But when people make comments about how they perceive me, what they see is different from what I would expect based on how I perceive my blogging persona. So it's quite possible that we need not only to draw a distinction between life-self and blog-self but also among the various blog-selves that multiply throughout the blogosphere. Yikes, I'm feeling rather frighteningly fragmented now. Time to go have a shower or eat a bagel, eh? Posted by: bubandpie at March 13, 2007 8:28 AM
I had to step back from my blog a bit because I was inside my head too much and inside my head is a scary place to be, full of dark corners and scary alleyways. But it had made me more honest with myself, which is good. Scary, but good. Posted by: julia at March 13, 2007 9:28 AM
Great post. Posted by: yankee,transferred at March 13, 2007 10:05 AM
Thank you, MaryG & YT. B&P, I'm shocked, just shocked. But it isn't just so much that blog-self is artificial, as that the artificiality is then enhanced by the hundreds of little mirrors called commenters and readers, and after a while, the reflections can come to seem more real than the reflected. And then after that.... Posted by: Andrea at March 13, 2007 10:48 AM
I feel like BubandPie. My blog-self feels closer to my real self than, say, the self that people see at the grocery store. In some ways, the blog-self is who I would *like* to be. There is a post I keep thinking of writing about my daughter, about the difficulties in our relationship, but I haven't done it because I'm afraid of making it so. You know what I mean? If I write "I think that the trouble that Sasha and I have now is going to continue throughout our lives" then that's some serious black magic. Posted by: Jennifer at March 13, 2007 12:01 PM
it's the convergence of both, yes? for me, the sum of my parts slow down when i write, and the parts that don't usually sit in the front of the class are then raising their hands for attention. but we are all in the same class. nice post, friend. Posted by: jen at March 13, 2007 12:15 PM
After B&P gave you the Fries last month (this month?), I decided to become a dedicated lurker, but this post tempted me to comment. Only the comment I started was about a billion words long, and I didn't think that would be the best way to introduce myself (although I am the queen of the multi-paragraph comments, so maybe it would be), whichever self is here today. Instead, you inspired me to dash off my own blog, which goes back to what you were saying on a previous post about the language of nna mmoy and the circular nature of blog meaning. And now my head hurts. Posted by: Gwen at March 13, 2007 2:24 PM
This was great. I think that B&P had a great point as well...I think I'm partially more true to myself on blog than off blog. I have a crazy personal censor in real life. And then Jen went and summed it up magnificiently. Posted by: Kyla at March 13, 2007 2:58 PM
I am generally a lurker here, too. The fact is that I can not write with near the eloquence you do. I'm out of my league... so I lurk. :) But the blog-self I present is probably more authentic than the real-life me. (Actually I don't like that dichotomy.. we all express ourselves differently in different environments. They're all "real".) In-person Chani is far more reserved, very quiet .. one you wouldn't notice in a crowd. If not for my unusual fashion sense, I wouldn't even cause blip on the radar screen. That feels safe and comfortable for me. I spent a lifetime cultivating invisibility. Blog-Chani is more open, hopefully revealing warts and all. There are very few things I don't write about and those things are kept private for a variety of reasons. The primary one is that it is not something that would generate conversation or exchange of ideas. Some of the things might make others feel defensive and sometimes I ride the tightwire between being brutally open and watering it down. It's all okay. Yes, I do blog for others. As I've said before, I can just think and save myself the typing energy if the objective was to do it only for me. Within that context, there's a decorum to be met, certain unspoken expectations. And I agree with you about choosing your own name. Too bad it's not a right of passage universally. It is part of defining the self ~ and putting a label on it that fits. Mine was chosen by someone else and has a specific meaning. Chanakarn means, literally, "darling of all the people." Since I am anything but.. the name serves to perhaps draw that to me, open me up a bit and make me more accessible. Sorry for the long comment. I really got carried away. :)
~Chani Posted by: Chani at March 13, 2007 3:01 PM
Jennifer--that's exactly what I mean. That by writing it, we can make it so. We talk ourselves into it, so to speak--so it's important to have a blog-self you like. (This grew out of that discussion about the reassurance-seekers, a little--I wondered what would happen to them in real life after developing and perfecting a blog-self htat is continually stressed, hapless, inadequate, disorganized, dysfunctional or clueless. Would they become that person? How couldn't they?) Thanks, Gwen. And ... would you like a tylenol? Chani, I like long comments, so go to. And thank you. I do think blog-self starts off as less 'real' than life-self, if only because the element of performance on blogs, of choice over what to disclose and what to reveal and how to reveal it, is much greater. But the interesting thing is, IME, it doesn't stay that way. Posted by: Andrea at March 13, 2007 3:20 PM
I'm reading these posts avidly, Andrea - and the thoughts in my head are bulging like a peanut in a squirrel's cheek. Posted by: Marla at March 13, 2007 5:46 PM
Terrific post with tremendous insight! I believe in a mind-reality connection... that what you continue to think about yourself will impact your true self. It's a challenging thing to monitor sometimes! Posted by: Miche at March 14, 2007 8:32 AM
Go Berserk |
Change is God (Octavia Butler, Parable Series) "The children of the revolution are always ungrateful, and the revolution must be grateful that it is so." Ursula le Guin Email Frances! frances AT athenadreaming DOT org You can email her mother too (that's me):
The Best of Beanie Baby
Recent Entries
Categories Monthly Archives Annika Info Earn Your Karmic Brownie Points The WHOYCBE Not So Secret Spoilers These links open in a new browser window. Random Writer's Quote Writing is so personal, so profoundly and terribly personal. Your entire personality goes into every word. The hesitation between one word and another is filled with many centuries, much space. And you deal with it one way, because of what you are, and somebody else deals with it another way. There are no rules. Even technically, some writers need all kinds of idiosyncrasies. One took a wet cloth to his forehead; another had to get drunk; a third had to take drugs; Hemingway stood, another was sitting, another was lying. ~~ Elie Wiesel
My Burgeoning Media Empire (that's a joke)
Dwarfism Resources: Frances's Big List of Misdiagnoses and False Positives Prenatally:
Postnatally:
Blogs I'm Reading
Other Mom Sites: Green Family Library
The title of this blog was taken from the short story "The Language of Nna Mmoy" by Ursula le Guin in her collection, Changing Planes. I won't tell you why or how, because I want you to read the story and figure it out for yourself.
|