« A Near Miss | Main | Frances Friday: Good Mother »

January 10, 2008

It was almost brief.

I've written so much about volunteering and 'enough' and finding time and making babies lately that I'm afraid, if I do it again today, I'll only make you mad ("speaking of ENOUGH, Andrea..."); so I'll use them handy-dandy bullet things to say:

1. Jen and Mad are having their baby shower today. Go have some cake and stick a gift-ribbon on their hair, and see the tremendous pile of shower gifts they're sitting on.

2. I am undergoing Screening Processes, since my volunteering options are the kind where they Screen you, to make sure you aren't a criminal trying to get access to vulnerable populations. So, no details yet, but it's still going to be 24 hours this year. The plan is the Big Sisters--they have group programs for volunteers who can't commit to the full 8 hours a month (the prospect of which makes me faint) and I love kids, and it will be good to work with people instead of trees and dirt, which is more my normal thing.

3. I'm also going to be interviewed about it tonight by the lovely and talented Bon over at Chrib Chronicles, around 9 pm Ontario time, and you do the math elsewhere. The link will be here. Bon and Jen and Mad and I will all be talking about the social justice wedding stuff, or at least we will at the beginning.

See? That was short. I can do short.

~~~~~

OK, I can't do short.

Hey! It's a day to read!

And you're here. Oops. So am I. So I'm going to tell you, first of all, that turning off the computer to read something print-based is a lovely idea. And secondly, since Friday belongs to Frances around these parts, I'm going to blather a bit about books today.

I taught myself how to read when I was three, according to my mother; and I see no reason to disbelieve her since my only memory of kindergarten is of sitting in the cloakroom with a grade-five student who volunteered to show me flashcards of words like "telephone" and "dinosaur" while I heard my friends outside drilling the alphabet. Thus I have no memory of a time in which I did not understand what letters are, how they are put together into words and how they connect with each other to form sentences, how the sentences link to make stories. I have no memory of a life before books. This makes it strange to see Frances tottering slowly towards literacy herself as I try to make this process conscious and show her how it all works.

Books are magic. I am an addict, and I'll admit this clearly makes me biased, but books are magic. Each one is a potent little package of incremental transformation. It mixes our own mind with someone else's, and when we pull back again, neither one is quite the same for the experience. A book makes a reader, and a reader makes a book. That object you hold in your hands and for which the bookstore charges you (or the library swipes your card) is not, properly speaking, the real book. The real book is what happens in your mind while you read it. That physical object, all those pages with black marks on it, is just the means of transmission.

Every book you read is yours and yours alone; it exists for you and because of you. The particular experience you have in your mind while you read it will not be duplicated by anyone else. No one else will see Anne or Gatsby or Huck or Peter Pan the way you did (until they make a movie of it, anyway). The author wrote it and lots of other people worked to get it to where you could pick it up; but you closed that loop and made it a book by letting it into your mind.

The internet doesn't do this very well yet, I don't think, because it is difficult to make your mind as open and receptive as it needs to be when your monitor is giving you eyestrain, your mouse is giving you carpal tunnel syndrome and your uncomfortable chair is giving you a backache. It is difficult to resist the temptation to skim, to skip, to click away when it gets difficult or challenging. I don't know if I can think of even five instances where something I read on the internet connected with me in the same place as a really good story or novel does, that left me saying "yes," even though I wasn't quite sure what I was agreeing to, or with, only that in some way I couldn't explain what I had read was the truth, regardless of its lack of factuality. The right book in the hands of the right reader at the right time can do this. It's magic.

If I were to even try to list all of the books that have closed this hidden loop in me, while I am closing the loop of that book while reading it, it would take an entire blog's worth of posts, and you would get bored of it long before I would. They change, of course; if you and I never read the same book because the experience in our minds is not the same, then it is also true that you and I never read the same book twice, because the experience on re-reading will not be the same, either. Some books worsen, and some improve. (Some are like comfort food and we re-read them to get the same experience again but I wonder, actually, if that's an illusion and it changes more than we recognize.)

Books are teachers and friends, counselors and prophets, therapists and clairvoyants, healers and lovers, magicians and heretics. Nothing else can do what a good book does, because a reader is not a watcher or observer but a participant. The words of a book are an intricate lattice with far more space than substance; space which you, the reader, fill in. That's work, and that's what makes the book yours. I think it was Margaret Atwood who said that no matter what it looks like, writing is a performance art; and she was right, and the audience, too, is up on stage, filling in the scenery, singing the chorus, and supplying the cast. That's what makes books special; and they are special, dammit. They're not just movies on a page.

Frances can't read yet. She knows her letters and understands that they make sounds and is beginning to understand that the sounds can be put together to make words. But she's not quite there. She certainly won't be reading "dinosaur" and "telephone" next year. But I don't care. I don't care how or when she learns to read (although I suspect that her teachers at a certain point might begin to hyperventilate). All I care about is that her current delight with books continues. All I want is for her to be able to pick up a new book with the same sense of anticipation and incipient pleasure that I do, looking forward to hours in one sense spent curled up under a blanket on the overstuffed armchair with a snack and drink to hand; and in another, equally real sense, spent in another life, another time, another place, another self.


Posted by Andrea at January 10, 2008 12:00 PM under Books , Friends and Others

EMAIL this entry

(comments fields are below this section)











Comments

For me, the computer is about information and quick distraction. Hold my attention or I will click away. Books are about concentration and being engrossed, and about story and magic.

I look forward to "meeting" you tonight.

Posted by: Mad Hatter at January 10, 2008 12:39 PM

Next Comment

Like so many things in my life you yet again steer me into another direction to persue something meaningful. As I read through your posts about your passion on books and reading I tell myself quietly that I need to carve out some time during my week to read real books. I've since made a mental note to schedual a library date with myself once or twice a week for a couple hours just to read. It serves many purposes 1-I get out of the house and 2- I feed my mind. Thank you.

Posted by: LauraJ at January 10, 2008 1:15 PM

Next Comment

You have to read - or probably already have, 'Literacy and Longing in L.A. I imagine you would love it. The main character goes on book binges and oh how I miss those days when my only concern was what to read first.

Posted by: Rosebud & Papoosie Girl at January 10, 2008 3:37 PM

Next Comment

Aaah, this is just how I feel about books and reading. I am actually pleased with the longer train trip I have to work after moving house, because of the extra reading I am able to do. My boss talks about reading work related material on public transport, and I nod away but secretly wince - I absolutely need to have some personal reading time at least once a day.

Posted by: Miss Cee at January 10, 2008 6:48 PM

Next Comment

It always catches me off guard and gets me a little breathless and excited when I read that someone else feels the same way as I do about books. Your words remind me of a poem by Thomas Lux:

THE VOICE YOU HEAR
WHEN YOU READ SILENTLY
is not silent, it is a speakingout-
loud voice in your head: it is spoken,
a voice is saying it
as you read. It's the writer's words,
of course, in a literary sense
his or her voice, but the sound
of that voice is the sound of your voice.
Not the sound your friends know
or the sound of a tape played back
but your voice
caught in the dark cathedral
of your skull, your voice heard
by an internal ear informed by internal abstracts
and what you know by feeling,
having felt. It is your voice
saying, for example, the word barn
that the writer wrote
but the barn you say
is a barn you know or knew. The voice
in your head, speaking as you read,
never says anything neutrally – some people
hated the barn they knew,
some people love the barn they know
so you hear the word loaded
and a sensory constellation
is lit: horse-gnawed stalls,
hayloft, black heat tape wrapping
a water pipe, a slippery
spilled chirr of oats from a split sack,
the bony, filthy haunches of cows . . . .
And barn is only a noun – no verb
or subject has entered into the sentence yet!
The voice you hear when you read to yourself
is the clearest voice: you speak it
speaking to you.

Posted by: Major Bedhead at January 10, 2008 7:02 PM

Next Comment

Yes. This is somewhat related to what you are saying, after the puffed sleeves aside the other day I picked up dear Anne again. I reached a certain part today and set the book down and said out loud, "I wonder if Anne might be gay." Then I went online to see if anyone had used queer theory to consider Anne, all-unknowing that a professor wrote an article that posits the same thing back in 2000. It apparently caused quite a stir and I had no idea! It's an entirely different dimension I hadn't considered on any of previous, countless reads of the same text. It was amazing. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to go on blathering here in your comments.

Posted by: Stacey at January 11, 2008 12:05 AM

Next Comment

Rosebud--no, I haven't; but I will have to put that on my list.

Julia, what a great poem. Thanks for posting that.

Stacey, can you imagine how LM Montgomery would have reacted to that one?

Posted by: Andrea Author Profile Page at January 11, 2008 3:26 PM

Next Comment

Still giggling about Stacey's comment and your response. I 'can' imagine and the resulting picture is funny to the max.
Thanks for the lovely word poem about packaged words. All I can add is 'me too'. And, Wow!

Posted by: Mary G at January 14, 2008 10:20 AM

Next Comment

It's probably a bad sign that I do a lot of my reading nowadays online. (wince) But there are some really good authors out there and really god stories that might never see print. Your online Frances biography for instance. For another example, fanfiction, which may never be published because of copyright issues. My favorite fanfiction author is Lilias. She posts her stuff at www.gwaddiction.com and I think its great. Hasn't been updated in a couple years though so I'm hoping she's writing stuff that will come out in print.

Posted by: Samantha at August 1, 2008 11:27 AM

Next Comment

Go Berserk




Remember Me?